NEWS

Business documents

Business Interruption Insurance

The COVID-19 pandemic has created disarray across a number of industries, companies who had paid under policies of insurance turned to their policies for cover during this time.

The insurance industry sought to avoid claims on policies industry-wide, leading to legal action being brought by the FCA.

The High Court handed down judgment on Sept 15th  2020 in the COVID-19 Business Interruption insurance test case of The Financial Conduct Authority v Arch and Others. Herbert Smith Freehills represented the FCA (who was advancing the claim for policyholders) in the case, which considered 21 lead sample wordings from eight insurers. 

The judgment provides highly-anticipated guidance on the proper operation of cover under certain non-damage business interruption insurance.

While different conclusions were reached in respect of each wording, the judgment is welcome news for a significant number of the thousands of policyholders impacted by COVID-related business interruption losses.

More information here

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you wish to discuss your cover, your business and how we may be able to assist in making a claim on your behalf.

NEWS

As a regular media contributor Michael is called on by journalists and commentators to provide expert insight on the latest cases and developments in financial services and regulated industries. 

Breaking news

latest media highlights

Business Interruption Judgment 

While no business owner could have predicted the outbreak of coronavirus, many felt secure in the knowledge that they had invested in Business Interruption Insurance that would surely pay out in the face of such a crisis. However, in many cases claims have been denied in the first instance by insurers, serving a devastating blow to businesses.

Today’s news that the Supreme Court has found in favour of businesses who have been denied payouts, and against the arguments of the six major insurers will signify a lifeline for many businesses.

However, the Judgment doesn’t mean that all Business Interruption Claims are clear-cut, each Business Interruption Policy is unique and complicated, with claims resting on specific issues. While today’s Judgment provides clarity on the opportunities available, businesses would be best advised to get their specific policy reviewed so that they can receive legal advice on the status of their position.

Visit https://lnkd.in/e277ggv for more info

Professional Advisor

ESG due diligence: What rule changes should advisers be preparing for?

The Business Post explores the impact of the latest Business Interruption Insurance ruling on business owners.

‘Bitter pill to swallow’: advisers react to FSCS interim levy. Micheal’s reaction to the news.

Professional Advisor

Michael’s piece on advisers must make clear ESG investing is not chosen for financial returns.

Michael writes for Pensions Age on why pension providers need to prioritise communication with clients during Coronavirus.

Michael comments on the FCA’s latest anti-scam campaign for The Daily Mail.

Michael discusses the ongoing case of Frost Financial Services
with The Telegraph.

Michael provides advice to FTAdvisor on historical complaints against Financial Advisors.

Michael speaks to The Times about former footballer Alan Shearer’s legal claim against his former financial adviser.

Let’s Work Together

Please get in touch and I look forward to helping with your enquiry.